Latest Asbury Park Press MAAC story/will run in paper Friday
""Many people do feel the university has some benefit for the community, but there
is a limit to the sort of (university) expansion we will tolerate in this
town.''Zahava Sher of Larchwood Avenue
""I live a block away from it, and I see what is going on.''Zoning Board member Douglas
Bostwick, who opposes the athletic center plan.
MONMOUTH U. PLAN DEFEATED
Zoners say no to athletic center
By CAROL GORGA WILLIAMS
COASTAL MONMOUTH BUREAU
WEST LONG BRANCH … The Zoning Board of Adjustment Thursday defeated a proposal for a
multipurpose athletic center for Monmouth University, despite an agreement by the school to
limit the number of capacity events there, a condition designed to minimize the impact on
neighbors.
Despite nearly a year of meetings, the board put off a vote at its November session after
several members said they still had reservations about some aspects of the plan.
On Thursday, those doubts lingered, even after Board Chairman Rocco W. Christopher offered
a motion to approve the $34 million plan, which was seconded by Board Secretary Irven Miller.
Board members Samuel Guidetti and James Meola voted with the two to approve. Board members
Ellen Anfuso, Douglas Bostwick and John M. Aria opposed the motion. Because the measure was
for a use variance, among other approvals, and required five affirmative votes to pass, it
failed.
Moments later, Bostwick offered a motion to deny the application. Anfuso and Aria voted for
that motion. ""I guess we're done,'' Christopher said when it was clear the outcome would not
change.
Christopher attempted to question Bostwick about continued objections, and Bostwick
acknowledged he was not satisfied with the testimony of the school's traffic expert who
indicated local roadways would not be overburdened by capacity events at the proposed athletic
and activities center.
Capacity events are defined as those attended by more than 4,000 people.
""I live a block away from it, and I see what is going on,'' Bostwick said. University
attorney Wendell A. Smith initially proposed 25, before switching to 20 annual capacity
events. When he mentioned 15 at the November meeting, Bostwick said he wanted the opportunity
to examine the center's schedule and then determine a realistic number.
On Thursday, the school proposed 16 university-sponsored capacity events and said
non-university events would have to be approved by the borough in advance. Those would include
functions such as high school graduations and athletic tournaments.
After the meeting, Patricia L. Swannack, university vice president for administrative
services, deferred comments to Smith, who said he would consult with the university before
deciding whether to appeal the decision.
For one resident, the board's rejection of Monmouth's application was good news.
""Very happy,'' said Zahava Sher of Larchwood Avenue, who had been a consistent critic of
the plan. ""I just hope it stands,'' she said of the decision.
""I think it is important for people to understand that many people do feel the university
has some benefit for the community, but there is a limit to the sort of (university) expansion
we will tolerate in this town,'' Sher said.
While Smith, university attorney Marc D. Policastro and board Attorney Thomas Klein had
worked on a capacity number to bring to the board at its December meeting, officials also were
to consider solutions to other neighborhood concerns, such as prohibiting parking on
neighborhood streets during events and potentially providing valet parking, to control any
overflow.
While Monmouth University officials maintain the 3,000 parking spaces available at the
university are sufficient for the center's need, Smith also said the university would continue
to negotiate.
On Thursday, the attorneys presented a resolution that would allow the West Long Branch
police to determine traffic solutions for any event in which more than 3,000 tickets were sold
but Bostwick said Police Chief Arthur N. Cosentino was unaware of any traffic plan.
Under the terms of the resolution, Cosentino's department would determine which streets
would have prohibited parking, and the university was to have paid the overtime for increased
police or security guards.
Board members said Cosentino had sought traffic-calming devices for Larchwood Avenue up to
Cedar Avenue, and Palmer Avenue to Monmouth Road and Whale Pond Road. He also wanted a traffic
light at West Palmer and Monmouth Road.
The university consented to pay for traffic-calming devices, provided the borough approved,
but did not agree to fund the installation of a traffic light, and Miller suggested a better
alternative would have been for a police officer to be stationed at that intersection during
capacity events.
Opponents have argued the school should consider a smaller center or a satellite campus
where an athletic and activities center would be welcomed.
But for University President Paul G. Gaffney II, the application was part of his plan to
create ""destinations'' on campus. This 152,400-square-foot facility, to be built with a
combination of public and private funds, was slated for two temporary parking lots in the
center of campus, northeast of Boylan Gymnasium.
It was to have been 647 feet from the nearest homes, which are on Larchwood Avenue. The
center is needed for the school to remain competitive, particularly in the National Collegiate
Athletic Association Division I athletic program, officials have said. There are 19 Division 1
teams at Monmouth.
The vote against the MAAC comes just a week after the West Long Branch Borough Council said
it would not pursue an appeal of a Superior Court decision upholding a zoning board approval
that permits Monmouth University to construct a 196-bed dormitory, parking lot and tennis
courts in a residential zone.
e-mail tonygsports@aol.com
is a limit to the sort of (university) expansion we will tolerate in this
town.''Zahava Sher of Larchwood Avenue
""I live a block away from it, and I see what is going on.''Zoning Board member Douglas
Bostwick, who opposes the athletic center plan.
MONMOUTH U. PLAN DEFEATED
Zoners say no to athletic center
By CAROL GORGA WILLIAMS
COASTAL MONMOUTH BUREAU
WEST LONG BRANCH … The Zoning Board of Adjustment Thursday defeated a proposal for a
multipurpose athletic center for Monmouth University, despite an agreement by the school to
limit the number of capacity events there, a condition designed to minimize the impact on
neighbors.
Despite nearly a year of meetings, the board put off a vote at its November session after
several members said they still had reservations about some aspects of the plan.
On Thursday, those doubts lingered, even after Board Chairman Rocco W. Christopher offered
a motion to approve the $34 million plan, which was seconded by Board Secretary Irven Miller.
Board members Samuel Guidetti and James Meola voted with the two to approve. Board members
Ellen Anfuso, Douglas Bostwick and John M. Aria opposed the motion. Because the measure was
for a use variance, among other approvals, and required five affirmative votes to pass, it
failed.
Moments later, Bostwick offered a motion to deny the application. Anfuso and Aria voted for
that motion. ""I guess we're done,'' Christopher said when it was clear the outcome would not
change.
Christopher attempted to question Bostwick about continued objections, and Bostwick
acknowledged he was not satisfied with the testimony of the school's traffic expert who
indicated local roadways would not be overburdened by capacity events at the proposed athletic
and activities center.
Capacity events are defined as those attended by more than 4,000 people.
""I live a block away from it, and I see what is going on,'' Bostwick said. University
attorney Wendell A. Smith initially proposed 25, before switching to 20 annual capacity
events. When he mentioned 15 at the November meeting, Bostwick said he wanted the opportunity
to examine the center's schedule and then determine a realistic number.
On Thursday, the school proposed 16 university-sponsored capacity events and said
non-university events would have to be approved by the borough in advance. Those would include
functions such as high school graduations and athletic tournaments.
After the meeting, Patricia L. Swannack, university vice president for administrative
services, deferred comments to Smith, who said he would consult with the university before
deciding whether to appeal the decision.
For one resident, the board's rejection of Monmouth's application was good news.
""Very happy,'' said Zahava Sher of Larchwood Avenue, who had been a consistent critic of
the plan. ""I just hope it stands,'' she said of the decision.
""I think it is important for people to understand that many people do feel the university
has some benefit for the community, but there is a limit to the sort of (university) expansion
we will tolerate in this town,'' Sher said.
While Smith, university attorney Marc D. Policastro and board Attorney Thomas Klein had
worked on a capacity number to bring to the board at its December meeting, officials also were
to consider solutions to other neighborhood concerns, such as prohibiting parking on
neighborhood streets during events and potentially providing valet parking, to control any
overflow.
While Monmouth University officials maintain the 3,000 parking spaces available at the
university are sufficient for the center's need, Smith also said the university would continue
to negotiate.
On Thursday, the attorneys presented a resolution that would allow the West Long Branch
police to determine traffic solutions for any event in which more than 3,000 tickets were sold
but Bostwick said Police Chief Arthur N. Cosentino was unaware of any traffic plan.
Under the terms of the resolution, Cosentino's department would determine which streets
would have prohibited parking, and the university was to have paid the overtime for increased
police or security guards.
Board members said Cosentino had sought traffic-calming devices for Larchwood Avenue up to
Cedar Avenue, and Palmer Avenue to Monmouth Road and Whale Pond Road. He also wanted a traffic
light at West Palmer and Monmouth Road.
The university consented to pay for traffic-calming devices, provided the borough approved,
but did not agree to fund the installation of a traffic light, and Miller suggested a better
alternative would have been for a police officer to be stationed at that intersection during
capacity events.
Opponents have argued the school should consider a smaller center or a satellite campus
where an athletic and activities center would be welcomed.
But for University President Paul G. Gaffney II, the application was part of his plan to
create ""destinations'' on campus. This 152,400-square-foot facility, to be built with a
combination of public and private funds, was slated for two temporary parking lots in the
center of campus, northeast of Boylan Gymnasium.
It was to have been 647 feet from the nearest homes, which are on Larchwood Avenue. The
center is needed for the school to remain competitive, particularly in the National Collegiate
Athletic Association Division I athletic program, officials have said. There are 19 Division 1
teams at Monmouth.
The vote against the MAAC comes just a week after the West Long Branch Borough Council said
it would not pursue an appeal of a Superior Court decision upholding a zoning board approval
that permits Monmouth University to construct a 196-bed dormitory, parking lot and tennis
courts in a residential zone.
e-mail tonygsports@aol.com
10 Comments:
Hey folks. While I, personally, feel your angst, your comments have to take the high road here..or they will not run.
Now..if I was running WMCX..first of all I would air an editorial expressing my disappointment with WLB...
And also from MU, I would submit a well thought out letter to the editor (of the APP) which I imagine would be published..expressing my thoughts on the matter..
Then..I would have a student president/spokesman ask to speak at the next WLB Boro Council meeting and, eloquently, explain MU students' perspectives on this issue....
What I would do overall is attempt to gain some local sympathy for the cause....
Now I don't know much about town procedures..the appeals, etc., but it is my opinion the matter will come up again in some form.......
Finally..maybe, and this again is strictly my opinion, if it appears this may never be resolved in WLB, at some point it might be time for MU to consider the satellite campus that has been suggested, and find a nearby community which ostensibly would welcome a MAAC...
And...the Outlook should get involved as well with some serious editorials.
Also how about someone (students) challenging this Bostwick guy to a debate..after all..he never offered a reason for objecting....and if he refuses..bad publicity for him and WLB....
and if MU students, WMCX, the Outlook, student leaders, etc., can't get aroused over this affront....well..than maybe the school should remain low D 1....
UNBELIEVABLE! As I suggested before Tony, I believe the only solution is going to be moving the athletic events off-campus. Of course it would be best to be on-campus but...
It seriously should make many members of the MU sports community upset that WLB is so full of themselves. I remember the countless tickets students would receive for parking anywhere off campus - it does not surprise me one bit that WLB has shot down the MAAC.
Monmouth is a great, growing college and instead of welcoming the university (as some "critic" stated they do) they further halt MU's needed expansion. First it was parking that was shot down, now this. Good riddance WLB, you'll have your quiet leaf covered streets without interruption. The only realistic option is moving the MAAC AND football stadium out of WLB.
Believe me Tony, there is a lot more I want to say but I decided to use my degree and keep it clean...
Thanks to those committee members who approved. As for the others, you can make up your own line here - "--- --- - ----- -- --------!!!"
Tony,
Don't know the legalese of all of this, but can't some kind of counter-petition be signed by fans (at our home games) to maybe get this thing tabled again?
Two idiots are holding back a whole community -- for what? a few nights a year of traffic?
Doesn't the majority ever rule in this country any more?
If they wanted quiet why did they move next to a university?
Tony,
I don't know where Douglas Bostwick & Zahava Sher (the main objectors to the MAC) went to college (or if they did), but you can bet that if they did they would have availed themselves to all of the conveniences & facilities that they had at their schools -- the same conveniences & facilities that their selfishness is now denying not only MU students, but the entire community.
This guy makes the statement 'I see what they're (the school) doing' -- well what does he expect?MU is simply trying to keep pace with collegiate life!
Absolutely disgusted -- better be an appeal from MU.
Tony,
This is outrageous and another case of small town political corruption. Now you can see why there is so much corruption in Monmouth County politics. The mayor had the ability to appoint "her alter ego" on the zoning board to be puppets for her spite against Monmouth University. The mayor ran her campaign exclusivley as a campaign against Monmouth University and its students. First, the dorm and now the MAC. I have to ask the question, "where is the west long branch Mt. Laurel plan?" There seems to be a prejudice against low income housing and student housing within the West Long Branch community. I am sure if the FBI did a thorough investigation, the politicians would be carted away like the past administration. The University should stop paying any property taxes to the city of West Long branch and begin its appeal and sue for damages as the town did not provide on expert witness against the MAC application.
The student body should rise up against this corrupt political administration and get organized and run its own slate of candidates to run the prejudice town of West Long branch.
Tony,
A follow-up to my last post regarding those 2 from WLB who were so vocal in getting the MAC shot down last night (Bostwick & Sher) --
If indeed they attended college, do you suppose they contribute as alumni? Don't you suppose those contributions might be used by their schools to BUILD BUILDINGS???
Of course, they wouldn't care about that -- it's not in their backyard!
Tony,the high road has been taken,the problem is MU got rail roaded.
Very disappointing. These are the same type of people that are in towns all over the state that always vote against any kind of local school budget increase just to keep their real-estate taxes down. They’re obviously not concerned about young people.
Tony,
I like the idea of a counter-petition. Could something like this help?
Maybe just have those from WLB who attend games sign it, because those of us who do not would not count?
Of course, it seems like the way WLB runs things, only those from WLB who oppose it would count!
Post a Comment
<< Home